|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
With a rich history since 1922, Davis & Young is headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio with offices in Akron and the Youngstown/Warren area.
Davis & Young provides high quality legal representation to the insurance industry and business community, as well as private institutions and individuals. Many of our insurance clients operate on a regional and national level. |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
| Four Selected for Inclusion in Best Lawyers in America |
|
|
|
 |
Paul D. Eklund, David J. Fagnilli, C. Richard McDonald and Martin J. Murphy were recently selected by their peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America 2010.
Since its inception in 1983, Best Lawyers has become universally regarded as the definitive guide to legal excellence. Corporate Counsel magazine has called Best Lawyers "the most respected referral list of attorneys in practice."
Because Best Lawyers is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey in which more than 32,000 leading attorneys cast almost two million votes on the legal abilities of other lawyers in their specialties, and because lawyers are not required or allowed to pay a fee to be listed, inclusion is considered a singular honor.
|
|
|
| Nine selected for inclusion in Super Lawyers 2010 |
|
|
|
Ohio Super Lawyers magazine named the top attorneys in Ohio for 2010, including our own Paul D. Eklund, David J. Fagnilli, Dennis R. Fogarty, Richard M. Garner, C. Richard Mcdonald, Martin J. Murphy and Jan L. Roller (Ohio Super Lawyers) and Patrick M. Roche and Beverly A. Adams (Ohio Rising Stars). Only five percent of the lawyers in the state are named by Super Lawyers.
The selections for Super Lawyers are made by Law & Politics, a division of Key Professional Media, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minn. Each year, Law & Politics undertakes a rigorous multi-phase selection process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, independent evaluation of candidates by Law & Politics' attorney-led research staff, a peer review of candidates by practice area, and a good-standing and disciplinary check.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bifurcation of Punitive Damages
On December 10, 2009, the Tenth Appellate District issued its decision in Hanners v. Ho Wah Genting Wire & Cable SDN BHD, 10th Dist. 09AP-361, 2009-Ohio-6481 (attached in PDF format) which includes two important holdings of apparent first impression at the appellate level with respect to Ohio tort reform. |
|
|
|
  posted December 10, 2009 by Richard M. Garner |
|
|
| | |
|
|
What Tort Reform Has and Has Not Done to the Statute of Limitations
Tort reform has always been a highly contested and controversial issue in the State of Ohio. The state legislature recently amended numerous pieces of tort legislation when it passed Senate Bill 80 ("SB 80"), commonly referred to as the Tort Reform Act. S.B. 80, 125th Gen. Assem. (2005). |
|
|
|
posted August 17, 2009 by Dennis R. Fogarty |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
